http://www.khouse.org/articles/1997/143/

Cell Replication

The details of cell replication are too complex to be described in detail here. A simplified outline is given below to illustrate the incredible process involved: 5

1. Replication involves the synthesis of an exact copy of the cell’s DNA.

2. An initiator protein must locate the correct place in the strand to begin copying.

3. The initiator protein guides an "unzipper" protein (helicase) to separate the strand, forming a fork area. This unwinding process involves speeds estimated at approximately 8000 rpm, all done without tangling the DNA strand!

4. The DNA duplex kinks back on itself as it unwinds. To relieve the twisting pressure, an "untwister" enzyme (topo-isomerase) systematically cuts and repairs the coil.

5. Working only on flat, untwisted sections of the DNA, enzymes go to work copying the strand. (Two complete DNA pairs are synthesized, each containing one old and one new strand.)

6. A stitcher repair protein (DNA ligases) connects nucleotides together into one continuous strand.

Read and Write

The process described above is only a small part of the story. While the unwinding and rewinding of the DNA takes place, an equally sophisticated process of reading the DNA code and "writing" new strands occurs. The process involves the production and use of messenger RNA. Again, a simplified process description: 6

1. Messenger RNA is made from DNA by an enzyme (RNA polymerase).

2. A small section of DNA unzips, revealing the actual message (called the sense strand) and the template (the anti-sense strand).

3. A copy is made of the gene of interest only, producing a relatively short RNA segment.

4. The knots and kinks in the DNA provide crucial topological stop-and-go signals for the enzymes.

5. After messenger RNA is made, the DNA duplex is zipped back up.

Adding to the complexity and sophistication of design, the genetic code is read in blocks of three bases (out of the four possible bases mentioned earlier) that are non-overlapping.

Moreover, the triplicate code used is "degenerate," meaning that multiple combinations can often code for the same amino acid-this provides a built-in error correction mechanism. (One can’t help but contrast the sophistication involved with the far simpler read/write processes used in modern computers.)

A Common Software House

All living things use DNA and RNA to build life from four simple bases. The process described above is common to all creatures from simple bacteria all the way to humans.

Evolutionists point to this as evidence for their theory-but the new discoveries of the complexity of the process, and the fact that bacterial ribosomes are so similar to those in humans, is strong evidence against evolution. The complexities of cell replication must have been present at the beginning of life.

A simple explanation for the similarities of the basic building blocks can be found if one realizes that all life originates from a single "software house."
References :

Maybe that some groups of monkeys evolved while others didn’t?

Would that not be making the Creationists argument a little better?

Kp
References :

I lack knuckle drag as I am sure you do too, but I have observed a lot of primates.
Some look like rats, goldfish and horses too, I’ve seen them all its a bit of a freak show out there isn’t it?

i don’t know, i regard them as a curse. with mammals i regard them all as having a soul – you only have to look into their eyes to know that we are in some way we are related – and what is this connection? i call it a soul.

i believe i have a soul, you have a soul; i believe mammals have one. whether this extends to all other creatures, i don’t know, but i respect all animals as potentially having a soul. i regard myself as an animal and i see no physical distinction between myself and any other species of animal. i believe that God made man (humankind) in His own image, therefore we have authority on this planet, we are given many gifts, skills and resources, flexibilty of our bodies and thoughts which the other animals do not have. but we are still animal.
References :

None of the apes you mentioned are even from the same genus as Homo sapien sapien…more or less the same species.

Very poor analogy…try again.
References :